Monday, 13 May 2013

Building Information Model... Model


Saying “BIM Model”, or “Building Information Model Model”, is a tautology. Extensive research by Professor James Vandezande, supported by a leading team of linguistics scientists at HOK, have proved beyond all reasonable doubt that, when said in conjunction, the phrase causes the heart of a fluffy kitten to stop!


This affliction is sometimes referred to as RAS syndrome (short for "redundant acronym syndrome syndrome"), also known as PNS syndrome ("PIN number syndrome syndrome", which expands to "personal identification number number syndrome syndrome") or RAP phrases ("redundant acronym phrase phrases"), referring to the use of one or more of the words that make up an acronym or initialism in conjunction with the abbreviated form, thus in effect repeating one or more words.

Instead, try saying “The model”, “The BIM” or any number of other harmless phrases.

R

Thursday, 9 May 2013

BIM Show Live TopGun



Last week, we hosted the inaugural BIM TopGun skills contest, at BIM Show Live 2013.

In its third year, the conference was a huge success, with over 600 BIM-savvy souls networking, sharing and learning over two action-packed days at the Crowne Plaza in London's Westminster, just a stone's throw from Big Ben and the Houses of Parliament.

This year, KnowledgeSmart was approached by the show's organising committee to replicate the popular 'Top DAUG' competition format from Autodesk's annual user conference in Las Vegas.  Never one to shirk a challenge, we worked with the BSL committee to create a vendor-neutral, general BIM knowledge quiz, covering topics including BxP's, COBie, IFC data, file formats, what happens when you say 'BIM Model' whilst presenting on stage (see below) and other such exotic matters!


The overall quiz comprised 15 questions, plus a bonus question, to be completed in 10 minutes or less. (In fact, we generously added 3 extra minutes to allow for the in-house Wi-Fi connection, which was creaking at times!).

After a slightly tentative start, we soon had a steady stream of willing BIMMER's, all competing to be crowned the UK King (or Queen) of BIM!  As well as competing for bragging rights and the title of BSL 2013 BIM TopGun, the winner was also to be presented with a coveted BIMMY award, by the Conference Committee.  So, frankly, the stakes could not have been higher.  To add fuel to the fire, many prominent members of the world-renowned #UKBIMCrew were also in attendance, each one determined to crush his or her competitors into the dirt! (Don't let the slightly enigmatic smiles fool you, this was BIM WAR!).



Over the course of the two days, we posted 74 scores, ranging from 25% to 83%.  Here is a breakdown of the results:

Overall average score & time = 53% in 11mins 56 secs.

Average score & time for the boys = 53% in 11 mins 53 secs.

Average score & time for the girls = 53% in 12 mins 34 secs.




Here is a breakdown of the Top 10 Leader-Board, after the final results were tallied:


The Top 10 scores ranged from 83% to 71%.

And massive congratulations to our overall WINNER, Mr Dave Lee, from HDR's London office, who is now officially the UK's most prolific BIM Champion (probably).


Here is a piccie of Dave accepting his BIMMY, from BSL Chair, Rob Charlton.


It should be noted, for the record, that several #UKBIMCrew members were conspicuously absent from the list of TopGun participants, come the end.  We thought long and hard about publishing a 'Wall of Shame', but decided in the end that this might be a step too far! :)

Congratulations to everyone who took part and thanks for making it such a fun event.

R

Sunday, 24 March 2013

Learning Plateaus


At KnowledgeSmart, we spend a lot of time speaking to firms about performance improvement. So what happens when, in the pursuit of advanced learning, we experience a slow-down in our development? We hit what is sometimes referred to as a 'learning plateau'.

A learning plateau occurs when forward progress seems to have stopped while engaged in learning a new skill. These plateaus are normal and commonly experienced periodically when learning to play a musical instrument, speak a new language, or learn some other complex discipline.

Dutch author, Lodewijk van den Broek, describes hitting the plateau as, ‘the experience where you feel that no matter how hard you try, there is no progress in learning. And even though this is not entirely true, the feeling is very real’.

According to van den Broek, there are two major things happening here. The first is that you have progressed past the bend in the 'learning curve'. There are different stages in the learning curve:
  •  Beginner stage (0% to 60%)

The curve is very steep and you learn very fast.
  •  Intermediate stage (60% to 80%)

This is past the bend in the total curve. Learning speed declines and this phase takes longer than the beginner stage.
  •  Advanced stage (80% to 95%)

Learning speed declines even further and the length of the stage increases as again.
  •  Expert or Master stage (95% to 100%)

Learning speed drops to slow progress and the length of the stage stretches into eternity.

So once you hit Intermediate level, your progress slows down. And at the same time it gets increasingly difficult to measure that progress. These effects combined result in the feeling that you have hit a plateau in learning.

US authors, Brett & Kate McKay, describe a road map for overcoming Performance Plateaus. Back in the 1960’s, two psychologists, Paul Fitts and Michael Posner, set out to uncover why we plateau. They discovered that when we acquire a skill, we go through three stages.

The first stage of skill acquisition is called the cognitive phase. In this phase, we must concentrate intently on what we’re doing as we figure out strategies on how to accomplish the skill more efficiently and effectively. The cognitive phase is riddled with mistakes as we learn the ins and outs of our new pursuit.

The second phase of skill acquisition is the associative phase. During the associative phase, we make fewer mistakes. Consequently, we feel more comfortable with the skill and begin to concentrate less on what we’re doing.

The final stage is the autonomous phase, or what Joshua Foer, author of ‘Moonwalking with Einstein’, calls the “OK plateau.” We reach a skill level where we’re able to capably do the task without having to really think about it at all. Remember about how much you thought about what you were doing when you first got your driver’s license? Now driving is fairly automatic, like brushing your teeth.

People used to think that you couldn't break past these plateaus because a plateau represented the limit of your genetic ability. No amount of exertion or education would help you overcome this wall. But Fitts, Posner, and other psychologists discovered that with the right approach and a few attitude adjustments, all of us can bust through our plateaus and reach even higher.

How to Overcome Plateaus
Take risks. Growth comes when we stretch past our comfort zone. The big reason many people (especially high-achievers) plateau is because they don’t like to fail. Instead of taking on challenges that will help us grow, we stick with routines that we know we can successfully do. To protect our ego, we’d rather do the wrong things correctly, than do the right things wrongly. This aversion to risk is a recipe for plateauing.

Embrace your failure. To overcome your aversion to risk, you have to give yourself permission to fail and be mediocre. Instead of avoiding the things that are hardest for them, the greats of the world specifically focus on those things; they purposefully concentrate on the areas in which they make the most mistakes. This keeps them from getting stuck in the autonomous phase and propels their progress. So instead of seeing failure as a negative thing, think of your failures as steps to success. If you choose to learn from your failures, they can bring you closer to your goal.

Another reason we plateau is because everyone around us is telling us everything is fine. We often confide in people who tell us what we want to hear, not what we need to hear. For example, we finish a project and take it to somebody for some “constructive criticism,” when really we just want some positive affirmation on what we did. If you feel stuck in an area of your life, seek out mentors who won’t pull any punches and will give you the honest criticism you need to improve. Yes, your ego will get bruised, but that’s the price one must pay for personal and professional growth.

Practice deliberately. Fitts and Posner discovered three keys to breaking through your plateau: 
1) focus on technique, 2) stay goal oriented, and 3) and get immediate feedback on the performance. In other words, you need to practice deliberately to break through plateaus.

Get back to basics. Even when you’re advanced at something, delving back into the basics can actually give you fresh insights that help you progress even further.

Think long term. When we think short-term, we have a tendency to feel that plateaus are permanent. But when we take the big picture view of things, we start to see plateaus as temporary way-stations that we’ll eventually get past with a bit of hard work. Moreover, by thinking long term, we give ourselves more latitude to take risks and fail because we see that missteps are just momentary setbacks in the long journey of life.
To cultivate this attitude, reflect on a time where you felt you had reached the end of your development in some area, only to later bust through the plateau. If it was possible then, it’s possible now.

Psychology author, Russell A. Dewey, PhD, describes what happens with a typical learning curve.
With repetition of almost any motor task, learning occurs, and a person becomes more efficient or effective at carrying out a task. Progress in skill learning commonly follows an S-shaped curve, with some measure of skill on the Y axis and number of trials on the X-axis. Progress is slow at first, then a subject may experience a burst of learning that produces a rapid rise on the graph.



The S-shaped "learning curve" typical of complex learning

Why does an S-curve of growth eventually level off?
What people call a plateau may be a period of stability after a skill is learned as well as it can be learned. Most growth processes follow the same S-shaped curve as motor learning. In general, an S-shaped curve of growth levels off because stability is attained, a resource needed for growth is limited, or a ceiling of performance is reached. 

What phases of learning a complex skill cause the "S-curve" pattern?
The S-shaped learning curve is most obvious when someone learns a highly complex task. The initial part of the curve rises slowly as a person becomes familiar with basic components of a skill. The steep ascending phase occurs when there is enough experience with rudiments or simple components to start "putting it all together." Rapid progress follows until the skill "hits a ceiling" or stabilizes at a high level.

To put this in the context of AEC-related skills monitoring, KnowledgeSmart analyzed the results of several thousand test results, covering basic 2D CAD skills (using AutoCAD and MicroStation software).

The results were as follows:

0-1 years' experience:  53% in 87 mins

4-5 year's experience:  60% in 77 mins

8-10 years' experience:  61% in 79 mins

Many times, we hear people say, I don't need skills testing or training, because I've been using (XYZ software) for many years. Could it be that, even in the case of experienced users, a learning plateau might have been reached, and a fresh approach to learning could prove beneficial in helping to further improve performance?

R

Friday, 1 March 2013

KS user group - April 11


It's that time of year again. We have scheduled the date for the next KS user group.

Here are the details:

Location:  Smeaton Room, Buro Happold, 17 Newman Street, London, W1T 1PD
Date:  Thursday 11 April
Start:  09.00
End:  14.00
Cost:  Free (Breakfast & lunch included)

We will be reviewing the latest KS tools in some detail, including a look at what’s coming up in the next 3-6 months. Plus a guest presenter or two.  Full agenda to follow, as the date gets closer. 

Places will be limited to 25, on a first come, first served basis.

Hope to see you there!

R

Monday, 11 February 2013

Testing Revit Architecture Skills - A 3-Step Approach


Revit Architecture is the most popular test title in the KS library. No big surprise. So let's take a look at how an AEC firm might create an appropriate testing environment for Revit Architecture, catering for users of all levels of experience and abilities.

Firstly, it's important to establish that not all users need to become Revit 'experts'. Many people have a primary role which means they come into contact with Revit on an occasional basis, but no more than that. So, do they need to become adept in the finer points of massing, curtain walls and Family editing? Certainly not! For example, PM's, Project Architects, Practice Principals, and so on.  However, in many instances, these people can benefit from a degree of knowledge and familiarity with the technology, not least from a project planning or resourcing perspective.  So some basic knowledge of the tools can be beneficial.

For these individuals, we have created a 'Level 1' assessment, called 'Revit Architecture for occasional users'. As the name suggests, it is a fairly gentle, introductory level test, which looks at some basic concepts, including:  Files & File Formats, Navigation, Views & Sheets, Measuring, Exporting Data, Families and Element Selection.

The fact is, casual users of Revit software sometimes make silly mistakes, mainly through lack of understanding, thus creating work for more experienced users tasked with tidying up their mess. This is a common complaint from design firms and one which is easily avoided.  Simply put, no-one gets access to a license of Revit, without first achieving a minimum 'pass' mark on the Revit occasional test (level to be determined by individual firms). Don't give someone the keys to the car, without first establishing they have a basic understanding of how to drive.

For the primary modeling team, we have the 'Level 2', or 'Revit fundamentals' level material. This is a general level test, covering a wider range of topics, including: Basic Element Creation, Views & Sheets, Detailing, Keynoting & Annotation, Worksharing, Dimensions & Rules, Interoperability, Families & Parts, Scheduling, Coordinates & Orientation and Outputs.

This level of test material can be used to create reliable benchmark data for the firm, compared to industry average statistics. Performance 'quartiles' (see image below) are an effective way of targeting users with incremental productivity improvements over time, with the appropriate modular training workshops addressing highlighted skills gaps.




For users placing in upper quartile 3 or quartile 4, we have a variety of modules which are designed to address more advanced Revit concepts. The 'Level 3' material covers more process based scenarios and looks at the impact of using the software in a project environment. Topics such as Revit Families, Work flows, Project process and Worksharing are covered in greater detail. 

In addition to test modules about Revit software, we have written some general questions about BIM and BIM management. So firms can create assessments which cover technology and also the wider Building Information Modeling environment, within which the software is deployed.

By targeting users with material appropriate for their job function, and also their current level of ability, AEC firms can now create more meaningful benchmark data, plan a more focused training strategy and adopt a stepped approach to measuring Revit and BIM knowledge across their teams.

R

Sunday, 6 January 2013

KS & Global e-Training Links

KnowledgeSmart has been working with the team at Global e-Training, to map the results for our most popular test titles, to the corresponding modular training content, presented within the GeT Learning Management System.

These titles now have full links to learning enabled:


AutoCAD 2D fundamentals
AutoCAD 2D for occasional users
AutoCAD Civil 3D fundamentals (parts 1-4)
Navisworks fundamentals
Revit Architecture fundamentals
Revit Structure fundamentals
Revit MEP fundamentals (Mechanical)
Revit MEP fundamentals (Electrical)
Revit MEP fundamentals (Plumbing)

To follow in the Spring:

Inventor fundamentals (parts 1-4)
3ds Max fundamentals (parts 1-4)


Click here for a short video, which illustrates the user journey between testing and training.

R

2013 Library Updates

Happy New Year!

We've been busy over the holiday period, putting the finishing touches to a selection of new KS library updates.  These include:

Revit Architecture 2013 - Advanced
Part 1 of 2 sets of challenging questions, looking at more advanced aspects of applying RAC on projects. Written by Paul Aubin.

Revit Architecture 2013 - Occasional Users
An introductory set of questions, written by Chris Senior, with part-time users of the software in mind.

Inventor 2013 - Part 3 (Drawings)
Part 3 of 4 sets, written by John Evans. Part 1 covers Assemblies. Part 2 covers Part Modeling. Part 4 to follow in Feb/Mar covering Welding & Sheet Metal.

BIM Management
A general set of questions, edited by Evolve Consultancy, covering a variety of different aspects of BIM Management and Coordination, including IFC and COBie.

Plant 3D - Part 1 (Project Setup and Specifications)
A general level set of questions, written by Joel Harris, covering project setup, template creation and customization. Parts 2-5 to follow in the coming months, covering the following topics: Piping specs & catalogs, 3D modeling, Document generation and P&ID.

USACE BIM Process
A general set of questions about the official BIM process, as created by the US Army Corps of Engineers. This assessment comprises questions looking at both the Policy and Content of the USACE BIM protocols. Edited by a sub-committee of the USACE BIM team.

We are working on some new titles in the Spring months.  These include:
Inventor Part 4 - Welding & Sheet Metal
Plant 3D Part 2 - Piping Specifications & Catalogs
Revit Structure 2013 Advanced
Revit MEP 2013 Advanced
Civil 3D 2013 Advanced
ArchiCAD
Bentley ProjectWise
Synchro

R